Speaking on the eve of the investors, Activision I recognized the bitter truth – Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare The fans did not like (in vain, or something, the premiere trailer for the game on YouTube scored 3.45 million diesels?). But this year they may not worry, since the new “call of the debt” that the studio is engaged in Sledgehammer Games, will return the series “To the roots”.
How the operating director put it Activision Thomas Tiber (Thomas Tippl), Infinite Warfare I did not manage to justify the hopes assigned to her, but all because part of the audience was clearly not imbued with battles in space. IN Call of Duty 2017 will be traditional fighting.
Executive Director Activision Eric Hirschberg (Eric Hirshberg) emphasized that users liked gameplay innovations Infinite Warfare. Just not everyone liked the space setting. And despite the fact that the situation Call of Duty (by the way, approved two years ago) will be more familiar, the developers still pamper us and some innovations so that the game looks fresh.
Meanwhile, at least Infinite Warfare and has not achieved success, the popularity of the franchise still does not fall. Believe Activision, Call of Duty The eighth year in a row remains a number one franchise in North America and in a year has a record number of monthly active users. So the publisher plans to continue to support the shooters with new content throughout the year Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered And Call of Duty: Black Ops 3.
February 10, 2017 Greedfall – new RPG with magic from the creators of Mars: War Logs and Bound by Flame
February 10, 2017 The third episode of The Walking Dead: A New Frontier will be released in March
Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare
The best comments
Hmm, there are no complaints about the setting of the Komsomol, on the contrary, the game looked at least beautiful.
The plot was bad with the wildest logical holes and the obvious ending and the lack of novelty in network modes. If nothing to change in this direction, then the next part of the series is about the same fate.
that at least there opened BF1? Such a boring loner still needs to be searched in shooters, it all started not bad in the mission on the tank, and then boredom. No epic, nothing at all
Do not forget about https://misterxcasino.uk/withdrawal/ the main enemy, around which there were so many conversations and advertising, but in fact there were 1.5 dialogue and 2 videos on the game engine
What? Maybe you confused when you wrote that they play in the sorcerer only for the sake of multiplayer? I bought the last sorcerer for 1300, went through the plot in 9 hours and did not even run online, it is not interesting to me. I do not spend any money on a gear, for me it is insanity and an empty waste of money.
There is no immersion in BF 1 in the First World War at all (single), a shooting range with boobs with weapons from the First World War. In the same Valians Hearts, where drawn graphics and budget, 100 times less, is much better disclosed the history of the First World War
Cod 2 was gorgeous for that time, production and entertainment. At that time, few could boast of cinematography precisely in the gameplay, and not just in katsets, and therefore the game looked extremely fresh. Now no one is surprised, it has already become the standard. Therefore, it is necessary to crush something with others, for example, the plot and characters. This is where INFINITE WARFARE happened to Ozrams.
I want an uncomfortable Stalingrad (so that for the house days, days!), Omaha scouring (so that Yankees with stacks, stacks!), Prokhorovka (so that tigers with high!), Perl Harbor (so that boats to the bottom, to the bottom!) and you can even Okinava (so that Japles with attacks, napalm!). And also a good graphene, New engine, a little koyukvy and Gary Oldman. For removal, of course 🙂
Uh -huh, another Siegfried line, so that the Americans stumble on the driftwood in the Alexande Forest, the Arnham bridge, so that the same Americans are grafenisto from it to the river, graphony battles at sea, ala bastard Sharnhorst, Gneisenau, Tirpitsa, Oigen, Hipper and Bismarck with Belfast, Warspight, Warspight, Warspight, Warspight, Warspight, Warspyt. Nelson … Tank Mesiyov under Arrakurt, Prizhanami and we’re clearing. Landing on Crete. Siege of Tobruka, Benghazi and Tripoli … Balaton operation, Korsun-Shevchenkovskaya operation, Garden Market … Battle for Baston. The assault on the eastern rampart, the siege of the Gustava line, the battle of Kassino, was the Mazhino, the Battle of the Bay of Leita, Ivodzima and Midueye … The banging of the northern Caroline, Fletcers, Aiovas, Missouri, Texas, Pennsylvania, Colorado with Yamato, Nagato, Fuso, Mojo, Mogami, ISE, ISE, ISE, IU, ISE and MOMOO. Atago … Airy battles over La Channel, Kuban, Norway and Romania.Blockade of Leningrad, a raid on Saint-Naser, a raid on Tatsin, night raids on Germany and Great Britain, so there are French, Polish, Romanian, Belarusian and German underground. Dohren that has not yet been shown, but they are eagerly howl that the setting of the Second World War has outlined himself.
EA killed a “medal for courage” … If COD still continues to live, then MOH is already dead. But there is the coolest plot, especially in the first parts. There are also Brothers in Arms. Very suitable thing.
“Activision recognized the bitter truth – Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare did not like the fans”
And what to do now honest reviewers of games? They were in vain 12/10 worked out or something. The game of the year, Activision, what are you?
And something does not converge in the statements of the activist. The development of a new sorcea has been going on for two years. At least since 2015. At the end of 2016, they released Infinry Warfare, he did not like it, and they decided that the setting in the game, which has been developed for two years, would be less futuristic. And what they developed for two years, even if the setting was not approved yet? Or there is such a dynamic plot that the setting can be changed on the go.
Lying, gentlemen, you just want to gain loyalty to the players with this statement, and the setting of a new game has long been approved. Because even despite the hellish dough of dough to journalists around the world, your last game with shit was mixed.
Sorry, of course, but the topic is the First World War (and not the battles in the scenery of the First World War) Dais purely. Or rather did not consider it necessary to reveal it.
And yes, the second world is needed. I don’t even remember anything freshly rare, but this is bad ..
I would not say that Call of Duty has a bad single campaign. On the contrary, they usually succeed, unlike Battlefield (exclusion of Bad Company-1-2)
Agree. The second world, in my case, has always been a face COD. So God grant that in the minds of the development the idea that “a new is a well-forgotten old”.
This is right now a joke was about “Mostly playing for multiplayer”? I spent almost 300 hours in World at War, where I played the campaign 250 hours, and it is a top there. The same thing with Black OPS 1 and 2 with WM 1.2.3. I replayed 10 times there everything was intensely, to engage in perfectionism with achievements, notes or “death cards”. In the following parts, the plot went out with a squalor.
With me really liked Battlefield Bad Company 2, especially an addition in the network game Vietnam, even now I play it and there are people there, in my opinion the best part.
You, the first world, Kaiser Empire. What ss? Only if Adolf is panting in passing from the gas ..
I have said more than once before and are not too lazy to repeat again: spit on the setting, if only the game was suitable.